These processors require expensive motherboards and coolers, and also feature six-channel memory controllers. ... Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. As you can see, more cores means more performance, and none of the other CPUs can touch the 32-core Threadripper 3970X.SponsoredPosts are written and edited by members of our sponsor community. AMD ties the compute chiplets together via the Infinity Fabric to a large central 12nm I/O die that houses two 32x PCIe Gen4 controllers and two dual-channel DDR4 memory controllers. Both processors support four channels of DDR4-3200 memory, but data transfer rates differ based on DIMM population. This is ultimately what breaks compatibility between the previous Threadripper motherboards and the new Threadripper motherboards.When Threadripper as a brand came to market, AMD promoted it as a product that could tackle any high-parallel throughput tasks. I won’t be the first one to try that, in case the magic smoke appears. Those X399 and 2nd-gen Threadripper chips? Based off of the same engine in the company’s Cinema4D renderer, Cinebench R20 has been updated to support AVX2 and AVX512 and scales pretty perfectly with core count.The 32-core Threadripper 3970X beats the 16-core Ryzen 9, but not by much.Here’s what you get in your Threadripper box: a torque wrench, sticker, and CLC adapter for Asetek-based cooler designs.GPU-based encoding wasn’t really conclusive, except to say that the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti wins.V-Ray Next was used to create Thanos in Avengers: EndgameFor our test system, we loaded Windows 10 1903 on a Corsair MP600 PCIe 4.0 SSD and installed a Founder’s Edition GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GPU and 64GB of Corsair DDR/3600 CL15 RAM. That is except for the 32-core 2990WX sitting behind the 24-core 3960X, which goes to show how much extra performance is in the new TR generation. vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Instead, AMD is introducing the new TRX40 platform, which works with the 3000-series and future Threadripper CPUs. 76. points. We cooled the 32-core Threadripper with a Corsair H110i RGB, with its fans manually set to 100 percent and iCue disabled.Cinegy’s Cinescore is a broadcast-industry test for COTs hardware, and more cores is better.The original 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX features four dies connected by Infinity Fabric. 76. points. With the third generation Threadripper being launched today, all of those issues go away: we get AVX2, we get better per-MHz performance, and a more unified memory solution. In this instance, AMD has zero competition from Intel without going into Intel’s enterprise range of hardware. Before we begin, a disclaimer: this post is meant for … 79. Intel Core i7-3970X. Our first run takes that 4K file down to 1080p. ... Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M. V-Ray Next also lets you run the GPU-focused workload in a hybrid mode, where you can combine the CPU and GPU or measure the CPU’s performance at the GPU’s job.First up is Maxon’s new Cinbench R20 benchmark. Although the Threadripper 3970X doesn’t beat the mighty GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, it comes surprisingly close.PCWorld helps you navigate the PC ecosystem to find the products you want and the advice you need to get the job done.At 2160P, the big Threadripper opens up a larger gap over the Intel and Ryzen 9 chips.If you’re doing 3D modelling, vote for a big, fat CPU.All this probably sounds great—unless you’ve bought into the previous X399-based, Threadripper series. But it does mean a single socket has scaled from a peak of 4 cores when it was first launched all the way to 16 cores.Technically I’m going to pull one CPU out here, the Xeon W-3175X. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. The score is especially a surprise given that the gaps from 8 cores to 16 and 18 cores are far closer.The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a decent performer on lightly threaded tasks despite packing a ton of cores inside.AMD is on a rampage. Both CPUs support 64 PCIe 4.0 lanes, four DDR4-3200 memory channels, and are built on a new sTRX4 socket with a new all-AMD TRX40 chipset.From our pre-briefings, we’ve identified 12 new sTRX4 motherboards bearing the TRX40 name for new TR3 users to get hold of. Add in support for PCIe 4.0, and the Threadripper 3000 series looks like a winner.AMD's Threadripper 3000 processors debut with much higher pricing than the previous-gen models: At $1,999, the 32-core 3970X debuts for $200 more than its predecessor, and AMD tacked on an extra $100 for the $1,399 24-core 3960X.
That’s on top of PCIe 4.0 support, more PCIe lanes, and faster DRAM. What was surprising is that AMD stated that they kept the keying, the little notches that make it easier to see if a CPU is/isn’t supported, the same as well. When AMD starts at 24-cores and $1399, while Intel finishes at 18-cores and $979, there is no overlap here – the price difference is substantial enough for each side of the equation not to be involved with each other. Based on 2,474 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen TR 3960X and the Ryzen TR 3970X, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,257 CPUs.