Both processors delivered similar average frame rates, yet the 1% low figure was 13% higher with the Ryzen processor. For anyone moving off of something like the i7-2600K or 4790K – present in this cart – you’re looking at noteworthy performance improvements.
1% low performance was closer but the gap was still there between the two.The third and final battle royale game we tested is PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds. You're at best gonna get the same level of performance with the 2700X. AMD’s Ryzen 3000 CPUs are some of the best processors on the market.
The 9900K was faster overall but the 3900X was only 4% slower on average, so not a bad result for AMD.Where the 3900X did surprise was in Monster Hunter World. Today we can finally show you how Intel's new octa-core 9th-gen processors perform. The oddity is just that it’s losing tests against its predecessor, even when those are simple tests of value, not necessarily performance. AMD is making waves with its latest 3000-series Ryzen CPUs, which includes the 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen 9 3900X and eight-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 3700X. Lower-end devices end up performing about the same, as they’re slower than the GPU and so not limited.Tested CPUs primarily include the below list:The move did not feel productive for Intel. But at the price of 529$(589£), it might not be for everyone.so AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Core i7-9700K will be our next best choice.in this article, we will be comparing gaming performance of both CPU along with Nvidia’s new Rtx 2080ti in different Games. Keep in mind that this is with MCE disabled, so it’s following the boost duration specification and sticking to a power consumption of 90W. The 2700X and 6700K also have relatively equal single threaded performance at stock. The 2700 at 4.2GHz falls behind in both frametime and total frame throughput. Intel i7-9700K vs. 8700K - F1 2018 Benchmark ... Intel i7-9700K Blender Benchmarks vs. 8700K, 9900K. If you’re playing at high resolutions and commonly GPU-bound, this chart illustrates the performance fall-off from becoming limited by another component. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). That’s good for the 9700K, although Civilization VI has never been particularly thread-intensive. The 9700K ends up ranked alongside the 9900K and 7980XE. The price increase of the 9700K over the 8700K also feels off-putting, and so the gains the 9700K makes in gaming are lost when considering the price increase. AFAIK it was one of the hardest hit CPUs by the security fixes.No. Next up we have Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and this is another title where Intel is a little faster on average but you’ll never notice the ~4% reduction in average frame rates when using the 3900X. First world problems.Assassin’s Creed: Origins at 1080p/Medium stands as our next benchmark.
As you can see above, the 2700X outperforms the 6700K by up to 20% in certain CPU-bound scenarios. In fact, the 2700X is slightly faster in some benchmarks. Then at extreme high frame rates, a 5% increase is going from 200 to 210 fps, which is not a margin worth getting too excited over.Another title where Ryzen seems to struggle is Shadow of the Tomb Raider and do note we’re not using the built-in benchmark which we believe would help out Ryzen's case. This doesn’t remain true in every case, like in Blender workloads where the additional threads of the 8700K prove advantageous. Then there were games where the 3900X was slower by a 10% margin or greater, seven titles in total where Ryzen was up to 16% slower.All testing took place at 1080p using an MSI RTX 2080 Ti graphics card to remove GPU bottlenecks.
If that’s the case won’t it be the same scenario as now? As an example, with 5 AI players that each take 10 seconds to process a turn, you would be waiting 50 seconds before you are allowed to make your next play.Compared to the 8700K, the stock i7-9700K ends up about 10% ahead in average framerate, although overclocking gets the 8700K to nearing equivalence when at 5.0GHz. You play at big boy resolutions ? If gaming is all that you do, makes little sense to upgrade from 6700k or 7700k. This thermal delta isn’t for any other reason than the 9900K drawing significantly more power in this test. However, from our testing, we’ve noticed that north of the hex-core R5 3600X, the scaling in games drops significantly. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Intel Core i7-9700K Gaming Benchmarks. That’s because we’re now hitting a bottleneck with the RTX 2080 Ti, resultant of the resolution increase to 1440p. (For login issues, please ctrl+F5)Civilization VI provides an important look at turn time performance rather than framerate performance, instead testing grand campaign AI turn completion times. At the same price, it’d be more tenable, but an increase to $400 to $430 is unpalatable in the face of Intel’s similarly performing i7-8700K at cheaper prices. I can recommend just fine.